Extemp Central

[fblike]

Since 1962, Myanmar has been dominated by a military junta.  This junta isolated Myanmar from the rest of the world and abused the rights of its citizens, notably those of ethnic and religious minorities.  In 1990, the junta flirted with holding national elections, but after the opposition National League for Democracy (NLD) won it the junta annulled the result and went about governing as if there was no election at all.  In 2011, Myanmar’s generals finally began the process of modernizing their country, making strides toward opening the nation’s economy to foreign investment, trying to reach a ceasefire with ethnic militias, and transitioning to a quasi-democratic system that allows Myanmar’s citizens to elect 75% of the national legislature, which in turn elects the nation’s president.  Last week’s elections were the first in more than five decades and once again, the NLD achieved a significant victory behind its Nobel Prize-winning leader Aung San Suu Kyi.  Unlike 1990, the military and its political allies publicly announced that it would respect the result, thereby paving the way for Myanmar to return to civilian rule.  However, winning an election and governing a country are separate tasks, and there are concerns that Suu Kyi may find it difficult to maintain her popularity and keep her diverse coalition of supporters together.

This topic brief will provide some important information about Myanmar’s elections, highlight how the elections do not mean that Myanmar has embraced universal democracy, and then discuss the challenges that Suu Kyi will face in a governing role next year.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

Read More