Tag: topic brief Page 8 of 10

Matteo Renzi & Italian Reforms

[fblike]

On February 22nd, Florentine mayor and Democratic Party (DP) leader Matteo Renzi became the youngest Italian prime minister.  Renzi, who is thirty-nine years old, has promised a series of reforms to shake up Italy’s dysfunctional political and economic culture.  While never holding office on a national scale, Renzi believes that he can use his first 100 days in office to get Italy moving again and restore it to its proper place as one of the major powers on the European continent.  However, old political and economic habits die hard and political observers, which include some of those in Renzi’s own party, feel that he is all flash and no substance.  Considering the fact that Italy is the third largest economy in the eurozone and that its economy has not fared well over the last two decades, Renzi comes at a crucial time in Italian history.  A successful administration could put Italy back on the road to economic growth and a more stable political system, but a failure could dishearten the Italian population and lead to populist leaders taking power from either the political left or the right.

This topic brief will summarize Italy’s political and economic problems, discuss the reforms that Renzi has proposed, and evaluate whether he will succeed in reforming Italy.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

The Farm Bill (2014)

[fblike]

Two weeks ago, President Obama signed the Agriculture Act of 2014 into law.  The Agriculture Act of 2014 is the first farm bill to be passed since 2008, when Congress overrode President George W. Bush’s veto and passed the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008.  The last Congress failed to pass a farm bill, but Republicans and Democrats were able to compromise and made the Agriculture Act of 2014 a reality.  The farm bill, which is passed every five years, is an interesting form of political theatre.  Republicans and Democrats from farming states typically support higher agricultural subsidies and funding for research, while liberal, urban Democrats and Republicans support funding for food stamps in the bill.  In fact, funding the food stamp program, also referred to as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), is eighty percent of the Agriculture Act.  Fiscal conservatives and free traders typically blast the agriculture bill as bloated, wasteful, and harmful for developing nations, but due to politics it is very rare to see the farm bill produce significant savings for the U.S. federal government.

This topic brief will break down the history of American farm policy and facts about the most recent farm bill, discuss cuts made in the bill to the food stamp program that have been opposed by liberal Democrats, and then discuss how agriculture subsidies impact American trade policy and the U.S. budget.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

Japanese Foreign Relations with China & South Korea (2014)

[fblike]

East Asia is gradually becoming one of the world’s flash points for future conflict.  China is extending its territorial claims into the Straits of Taiwan and the South China Sea, North Korea has nuclear capabilities and threatens its neighbors, Japan is flirting with the idea of scrapping elements of its pacifist constitution and providing for its own defense, China continues to claim that Taiwan is part of its territory, and America’s allies in the region are skittish about whether the United States will truly come to their aid in a time of crisis.  Since World War II, the United States has built its defense network in East Asia on the back of close relations between Japan and South Korea and although this defense network was meant to oppose the Soviet Union during the Cold War, it is now becoming a system to contain the rise of communist China.  However, United States foreign policy in the region could unravel based on the steps that Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who came to power in December 2012, decides to take.  Aggressive moves by Japan could produce a war that America has to commit forces to in the near future and its strained ties with South Korea over historical issues could complicate a strong American response to China and North Korea.

This topic brief will provide an explanation of Japanese foreign relations with China and South Korea.  It will discuss Japan’s relationship with both nations and then provide an explanation for how to handle questions related to whether a war in East Asia is becoming unavoidable.  The analysis contained in this brief can help international and United States extempers best grapple with questions about Japanese foreign policy and understand what motivates the power players in East Asia.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

Immigration Reform (2014)

[fblike]

For the last three decades, U.S. policymakers have grappled with the problem of illegal immigration, whereby immigrants from all parts of the world (not just Mexico) come to the United States and live and work without securing legal documents that allow them to do so.  In 1986, the United States thought it could solve the problem with an amnesty package, but the number of illegal immigrants has increased since that time and it is estimated today that there are 11-12 million illegal (also called “undocumented” by immigration groups and their allies) immigrants in the U.S. today. In fact, studies have shown that since the 1990s, illegal immigration in the United States has largely outpaced legal immigration. Deporting all of these people would be taxing for the federal government and be a public relations nightmare.  As a result, the federal government is caught in a tough position of how to deal with these 11-12 million people while ensuring that future waves of unlawful immigration do not happen again.  In 2012, President Barack Obama promised action on immigration reform to address this issue and although the Senate passed a bipartisan immigration reform bill last June, the Republican dominated House has yet to do the same and has refused to take up the Senate bill.  Due to the growing Latino population in the United States (although again, I would caution extempers that illegal immigration is not exclusively a Latino issue), immigration reform is likely to be a hot button political and social issue for quite some time and extempers need to have a firm grasp on the legislative history and possibilities of reform to answer questions about this subject.

This topic brief will provide a history of immigration reform in the United States, discuss various proposals for immigration reform at the present time, and then analyze the possibilities of an immigration reform package being secured before the 2014 midterms or before the 2016 presidential election.  This brief will center more on Latino illegal immigration due to the large amount of news coverage about the issue.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

Ukraine’s Political Crisis

[fblike]

For the last two months demonstrations have been waged against the Ukrainian government of Victor Yanukovych.  Yanukovych, who was elected to the presidency in 2010, triggered the protests by turning down an association agreement with the European Union (EU).  The protests have only grown larger since Yanukovych’s governing party pushed through a controversial anti-protest law that stifled nearly all forms of free speech and to date, at least six people have died in clashes between protesters and security officials.  Geopolitical analysts see Ukraine as a diplomatic battleground between the West and Russia and Ukraine’s political problems often pit the EU and the United States against Russia and its president Vladimir Putin.  This means that questions about Ukraine often appear in rounds about Europe and American foreign policy over the course of a season and the current unrest in Ukraine makes it very likely that you could see a question about it at your state tournament.

This topic brief will provide essential details that you need to know about Ukraine when analyzing its politics, break down the causes and course of the unrest plaguing the country, and lay out some of the policy options present to Ukraine’s existing leadership, its political opposition, and international actors.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

The Gay Marriage Debate

[fblike]

Since November 2003, when the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health that gay couples in Massachusetts had a right to marry, gay marriage has been a hot political topic.  Some could also argue that the passage of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 1996 made gay marriage a political issue, but the 2003 Massachusetts ruling in conjunction with San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom ordering his city to issue marriage licenses to gay couples in 2004 made the gay marriage debate a more prominent national issue.  President George W. Bush was able to use state-level constitutional amendments that prohibited gay marriage to provide momentum to his re-election campaign in 2004 and push for a national constitutional amendment to ban the practice.  Since 2004 the proponents of gay marriage have experienced significant judicial victories, with the Supreme Court invalidating an element of DOMA last year and four states legalizing gay marriage after the decision:  New Jersey, Hawaii, Illinois, and New Mexico.  Currently, seventeen states, along with the District of Columbia, recognize gay marriage and lawsuits are pending in federal courts to invalidate state constitutional amendments that prohibit gay marriage.  Due to the growing number of lawsuits on the state level against gay marriage prohibitions, it only seems like a matter of time before the Supreme Court will have to weigh in about gay marriage again and extempers could confront questions about the constitutionality of gay marriage in  the near future.

This topic brief will provide a brief history about the gay marriage debate, break down judicial decisions that are pending concerning the issue, and then provide a brief analysis of how gay rights could impact American foreign policy.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

Bangladeshi Political Violence

[fblike]

On January 5th, Bangladesh held parliamentary elections that were marred by a widespread opposition party boycott and violence against supporters of Bangladesh’s governing Awami League and the country’s Hindu minority.  The international community condemned the violence and has urged the Awami League to reach a political agreement with its main rival, the Bangladesh National Party (BNP) so that new elections can be held to create a legitimate government.  Thus far, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has shown little willingness to compromise with the opposition.  Bangladesh has been one of the global economic success stories since 1990 and has successfully reduced levels of poverty through international trade agreements.  However, the recent political violence could ruin the country’s international image, its economic progress, and make it a center for Islamic extremism.

This topic brief will provide an overview of the basics of Bangladeshi politics, discuss the January 5th vote and the controversies surrounding it, and then point out some issues that extempers should be aware of as they continue to read about Bangladesh’s political situation.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

Sochi Olympic Concerns

[fblike]

Last week, on December 29th and 30th, two suicide bombings in Volgograd, a Southern Russian city formerly known as Stalingrad, killed at least thirty-four people and sent at least fifty others to the hospital.  The town of Volgograd is located 400 miles from Sochi, where next month’s Winter Olympics will be held.  Although no group has taken responsibility for the attacks as of the time of this brief, Russian security forces and international experts believe that the suicide attacks are listen to terrorist groups in the North Caucasus region of Russia, whose Muslim population has long sought self-government.  Considering that Doku Umarov, a Chechen terrorist leader, proclaimed in July that he wanted to disrupt the Olympics, there are concerns in the international community that the Sochi Olympics would become a 2014 version of the 1972 Munich Games, which were marred by the murder of eleven Israeli athletes at the hands of Palestinian terrorists.  Russian President Vladimir Putin is also facing international condemnation for his nation’s policies regarding homosexuals and the gradual erosion of democratic safeguards that were put in place after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991.  Due to these issues, it would not be surprising to encounter questions at tournaments over the next six weeks about the Sochi Olympics and whether Russia is capable of protecting the athletes and tourists attending the event and how it should respond to international criticisms of its domestic policies.

This topic brief will discuss three of the most prominent concerns and controversies of the Sochi Olympics so that extempers will be better prepared to talk about these issues.  It will cover the security situation in Russia, the gay rights debate surrounding the Olympics, and Putin’s questionable human rights record.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

The Affordable Care Act (2013)

[fblike]

During his first year in office President Obama decided to tackle a problem that had frustrated previous presidents:  universal healthcare.  Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, and Bill Clinton had all proposed plans for a universal health insurance program, but none of them were able to make them part of American law.  From 2009-2010, the U.S. Congress debated the feasibility of having a universal healthcare system and in March 2010, President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, into law.  President Obama’s push for universal healthcare was assisted by the Democrats having a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate and a majority in the House, but opposition to the ACA from voters played a role in giving the Republicans control of the House in the 2010 midterms.  After several years of planning, the ACA has begun its rollout, but extempers are likely aware that elements of this rollout have been botched, notably on the government’s healthare.gov website which is supposed to a portal for citizens of thirty-six states to shop for health insurance.  President Obama has also used his executive powers to delay mandates in the law, which are currently being challenged in the court system as a usurpation of legislative authority.  Due to the politics of the ACA and questions about its implementation, extempers will be handling questions about the ACA for seasons to come.

The ACA has been the subject of many rumors, misinformation, and distortions since it was formulated and passed into law.  This confusion about the law has made implementation difficult and made it difficult for President Obama to rally public opinion behind the law.  This confusion has also affected extempers, who may be unsure about the intentions of the ACA and what it does.  This topic brief will not stake out a political position on the ACA because it is Extemp Central’s belief that these topic briefs should provide you with enough information to reach your own conclusions.  Instead, this topic brief will break down the reasons why the ACA was implemented, what the ACA does, arguments and complaints made by liberals and progressives in the Democratic Party over the legislation, arguments and complains made by conservatives and libertarians in the Republican Party over the legislation, and provide some tips for handling future questions on the ACA.  It is our hope that after reading this brief you will have a better understanding of the ACA and be more confident when speaking about it in future rounds.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

2013 Venezuelan Municipal Elections & The Venezuelan Economy

[fblike]

It has been a very tumultuous year in Venezuelan politics.  In March Hugo Chavez, who governed the country for fourteen years and attempted to create a vibrant socialist movement in Latin America called Bolivarian Socialism, died of cancer and his successor Nicolas Maduro, a former bus driver and union activist, barely won the presidency in a disputed April election.  In the midst of high crime rates and poor economic problems, Venezuela held municipal elections for 337 mayoral seats and 2,435 city council officials on December 8th.  The opposition, named the Democratic Unity alliance (MUD), called for voters to reject members of Maduro’s Unified Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) and turned the election into a national referendum.  The election result ended up mixed, as PSUV won a higher percentage of ballots cast for its candidates, winning 49-43%, but the MUD won control of five of the country’s most populous cities, which include the capital city of Caracas.  The next round of national elections are not scheduled until 2015 and the opposition are hoping to recall Maduro from office by 2016.  However, the immediate result of the municipal elections may give Maduro some breathing room to consolidate his grip on power and handle Venezuela’s looming economic problems, which could impair the advancement of Bolivarian Socialism next year.

This topic brief will provide an overview of the municipal elections, explore Venezuela’s economic problems, and how the election may impact Maduro’s handling of his political opponents and the Venezuelan economy over the next year.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

Raising the Minimum Wage

[fblike]

Since 2009, the federal minimum wage has been $7.25.  The last time that Congress voted for a minimum wage increase was 2007, which occurred in the aftermath of the Democrats winning control of both houses of Congress for the first time since 1995.  During last year’s State of the Union, President Barack Obama called for increasing the federal minimum wage and reiterated his support for this on December 5th.  President Obama has supported a phased-in minimum wage hike to $10.10, which would go into effect in 2015.  Congressional Democrats have supported the President’s plan and argue that a new minimum wage hike should also be indexed to inflation to ensure that minimum wage gains are not eventually diluted by depreciation.  With twenty-one states having higher minimum wage levels than the federal government and recurring strikes taking place in the fast food industry, a topic that Extemp Central broke down a few months ago, the debate on a new minimum wage hike could impact the 2014 midterm elections by putting economic inequality back into the national spotlight.

This topic brief will provide extempers with a brief history of the minimum wage, break down arguments for and against raising the minimum wage, and discuss how it could potentially shape the outcome of the 2014 midterm elections.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

The U.S.-Afghan Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA)

[fblike]

The United States invaded Afghanistan on October 7, 2001 to topple the country’s Taliban-led government, capture Osama bin Laden, and destroy al-Qaeda.  The war has been America’s longest conflict and more than 2,000 American troops have been killed and more than 19,000 have been wounded.  Since the Iraq invasion of 2003, Afghanistan has played second fiddle to the global war on terrorism and the war has largely been ignored by the national media since President Obama assumed office in 2009.  Although President Obama committed more American forces to Afghanistan, which emulated the “surge” strategy used in Iraq in 2007, America’s presence in the country is beginning to wind down.  2014 marks the end of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) combat mission and the United States is trying to negotiate a bilateral security agreement (BSA) with Afghan President Hamid Karzai that would allow American forces to remain in the country to train Afghan soldiers and continue counterterrorism operations.  However, while Afghan elders have approved of the BSA, President Karzai has said that he will not sign the agreement until after Afghanistan holds presidential elections in April.  He has also issued new conditions that the United States must agree to in order to get him to sign the BSA.  The United States argues that Karzai cannot wait that long to sign the agreement and that if he fails to do so soon they will withdraw all combat forces from the country by the end of the 2014.

This topic brief will discuss the terms of the BSA, Karzai’s objections to the current agreement, and discuss the likelihood of the United States reaching a BSA agreement with Afghanistan by April of next year.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

The Temporary Iranian Nuclear Deal

[fblike]

In the morning hours of November 24th the P5+1, the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (The United States, Russia, Great Britain, France, and China) and Germany reached a six month agreement with Iran over its nuclear program.  Since 2002, when Iranian dissidents revealed the scope of Iran’s nuclear activities, the international community has tried to prevent Iran from acquiring the capacity to produce a nuclear weapon.  The Islamic Republic insists that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the United States, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and other international actors believe that Iran is seeking to acquire a nuclear weapons program to enhance its strategic position in the Middle East.  The agreement, the Joint Plan of Action, is an interim agreement that is supposed to lay the foundation for a more comprehensive deal that could prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons capability and lead to closer U.S.-Iranian relations, which have been strained since the Islamic Republic was born in 1979.

This topic brief will break down the Joint Plan of Action, evaluate the reactions of Americans, Saudis, and Israelis to the deal, and then discuss the chances for a more holistic agreement on Iran’s nuclear program by the summer of 2014.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

Common Core Standards

[fblike]

Last week Secretary of Education Arne Duncan sparked a firestorm over the controversial Common Core State Standards (CCSS), which are aimed at raising education standards nationwide to meet college and career ready targets.  Addressing criticism of the standards, Duncan argued that white, suburban mothers were angry because their children and schools were not as good as they felt they were.  Forces that oppose Common Core standards immediately called for his resignation and he apologized for his comments several days later.  The firestorm over Common Core standards is one of the most interesting domestic issues because it is one issue where far-left and far-right forces find areas of agreement.

This topic brief will explain the formation of the Common Core State Standards and their purpose, explore the hostility found toward the standards from liberal and conservative forces, and discuss issues that could weaken support for the Common Core in the future.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

The Asian Space Race

[fblike]

Two weeks ago, India launched its Mangalyaan mission to Mars.  The mission, which will take ten months to reach Mars, is intended to study the Martian atmosphere and conduct scientific tests to determine if any forms of life exist on the Red Planet.  If India’s mission is successful, it would become the first Asian nation to launch a successful Martian mission and it would become the first nation to successfully reach Mars in its first mission attempt.  Success would also increase the prominence of the Indian space program, which launched a successful lunar mission in 2008.  Since China is considered the preeminent space power in Asia, having already placed a men and women in Earth’s orbit and having more powerful rockets than India, analysts are speculating that India’s Mars mission could inaugurate a space race between both powers, setting the tone for twenty-first century space exploration.

This topic brief will describe India’s Mars mission and compare it to other Asian nations that have pursued a space exploration, assess how the Mars mission can enhance India’s international profile, and then assess the status of the Asian space race.

Readers are also encouraged to use the links below and in the related R&D to bolster their files about this topic.

Page 8 of 10

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén